Wireshark · Wireshark-users: Re: [Wireshark-users] about next sequence number in TCP head

Huge thanks to our Platinum Members Endace and LiveAction,
and our Silver Member Veeam, for supporting the Wireshark Foundation and project.

Wireshark-users: Re: [Wireshark-users] about next sequence number in TCP head

From: Guy Harris <guy@xxxxxxxxxxxx>

Date: Thu, 18 Dec 2008 17:03:53 -0800


On Dec 18, 2008, at 5:00 PM, Bo Xu wrote:

I have found the TCP application are implying these N+M rule .

In RFC793 , which part clearly decribes this rule ?


Section 3.3.

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [Wireshark-users] about next sequence number in TCP head
  - From: Bo Xu

References:
- [Wireshark-users] about next sequence number in TCP head
  - From: Bo Xu
- Re: [Wireshark-users] about next sequence number in TCP head
  - From: Guy Harris
- Re: [Wireshark-users] about next sequence number in TCP head
  - From: Bo Xu

Prev by Date: Re: [Wireshark-users] about next sequence number in TCP head
Next by Date: Re: [Wireshark-users] about next sequence number in TCP head
Previous by thread: Re: [Wireshark-users] about next sequence number in TCP head
Next by thread: Re: [Wireshark-users] about next sequence number in TCP head
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

© Wireshark Foundation · Privacy Policy

Facebook·Mastodon·Twitter·YouTube