Thanks,
Sorry for misleading, but I forgot to say that I refer to the third pain in
witch the address is the phisical address or the length in bytes ( in hexa)
from the start of the packet.
Thanks
I. lesher
This is a Wireshark (the new name for Ethereal, as of a little over a
year ago) issue, not a WinPcap issue; I'm redirecting it to the
wireshark-users mailing list, which is the list where questions about
Wireshark should be asked. Further discussion should take place on that
list. See
http://www.wireshark.org/lists/
for information on Wireshark mailing lists.
What do you mean by "follow the addressing of the whole packet" and
"specific to the HTTP data"?
The first column is probably the frame number, and the second column is
usually the packet time stamp. Do you mean the third column? If so,
that's usually the source IP address, which would be the IP address that
sent the packet; IP has no idea whether it's sending HTTP or not. An IP
datagram has an IP address; there is no notion that part of one IP
datagram has one IP address and another part has another address, so the
only addressing is "the addressing of the whole packet" - there's no
addressing specific to the HTTP data.
