ANNOUNCEMENT: Live Wireshark University & Allegro Packets online APAC Wireshark Training Session
July 17th, 2024 | 10:00am-11:55am SGT (UTC+8) | Online

Wireshark-dev: Re: [Wireshark-dev] Wireshark on Kali linux

From: João Valverde <joao.valverde@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 6 Feb 2019 12:46:20 +0000


On 06/02/19 09:08, Dario Lombardo wrote:
> This would mean that they'd have to build Wireshark differently from the default way it's built, using the "package for systems that run everything as root" option.  That means a standard Debian package, built to run on a system where you *don't* run everything as root, so that you can leave the safety checks in place, won't be appropriate for Kali.

I was thinking to something like maintaining a list of debian derivative that have just the root account (the version checked with lsb_release) and run something on them during the installation phase.

 > - use something else other than error() when disabling dofile()
> (something that won't generate such a disruptive dialog window for example).

That was my first try. Something like error -> warning, but I didn't find anything useful. Are you aware of something?


I'm not aware of anything out-of-the-box. It would probably require some UX work in Qt to make this notification more user-friendly.

I have some doubts about the effectiveness and usefulness of this Lua sandbox. I didn't investigate in depth but it seems enabling/disabling the Lua runtime instead would be better, as dictated by policy (whatever that policy is).