-----Original Message-----
>From: Wireshark-dev <wireshark-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> On Behalf Of Peter
>Wu
>Sent: den 9 november 2018 00:22
>To: Antoine d'Otreppe <a.dotreppe@xxxxxxxxxx>; Developer support list for
>Wireshark <wireshark-dev@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>Subject: Re: [Wireshark-dev] Anyone working on a Syncthing dissector?
>
>Hi Antoine!
>
>Based on the specifications for Syncthing, it appears that it uses Protobuf
>for defining its messages:
>https://docs.syncthing.net/specs/
>
>I am not sure how well protobuf is currently supported on Wireshark, you
>could scan the issue tracker and code review site to see if there is any
>current work in that area.
>
>Kind regards,
>Peter
>https://lekensteyn.nl
>(pardon my brevity, top-posting and formatting, sent from my phone)
Hi,
I think these pending commits are relevant:
https://code.wireshark.org/review/#/c/22892/
https://code.wireshark.org/review/#/c/23988/
Regards
Anders
On November 8, 2018 9:32:50 PM GMT+01:00, Antoine d'Otreppe
<a.dotreppe@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>Hi there,
>
>I'm interested in learning more about wireshark in general, and in
>particular learning how to make my own dissectors.
>
>I just happened to find a protocol that doesn't seem to have any
>dissector for it yet: syncthing. https://syncthing.net/ The local
>discovery protocol looks easy enough to begin with, as it is only UDP
>broadcasts.
>
>Your developer guide recommends to send a mail before starting
>development to check if anyone else would be working on a similar
>topic. That sounds reasonable :)
>
>Anybody working on that protocol yet?
>
>Regards,
>Antoine d'Otreppe
___________________________________________________________________________
Sent via: Wireshark-dev mailing list <wireshark-dev@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Archives: https://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev
Unsubscribe: https://www.wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev
mailto:wireshark-dev-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx?subject=unsubscribe
Attachment:
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
