Wireshark-dev: Re: [Wireshark-dev] Anyone working on a Syncthing dissector?
From: Anders Broman <[email protected]>
Date: Fri, 9 Nov 2018 08:32:17 +0000
-----Original Message-----
>From: Wireshark-dev <[email protected]> On Behalf Of Peter 
>Sent: den 9 november 2018 00:22
>To: Antoine d'Otreppe <[email protected]>; Developer support list for 
>Wireshark <[email protected]>
>Subject: Re: [Wireshark-dev] Anyone working on a Syncthing dissector?
>Hi Antoine!
>Based on the specifications for Syncthing, it appears that it uses Protobuf 
>for defining its messages:
>I am not sure how well protobuf is currently supported on Wireshark, you 
>could scan the issue tracker and code review site to see if there is any 
>current work in that area.
>Kind regards,
>(pardon my brevity, top-posting and formatting, sent from my phone)

I think these pending commits are relevant:


On November 8, 2018 9:32:50 PM GMT+01:00, Antoine d'Otreppe 
<[email protected]> wrote:
>Hi there,
>I'm interested in learning more about wireshark in general, and in
>particular learning how to make my own dissectors.
>I just happened to find a protocol that doesn't seem to have any
>dissector for it yet: syncthing. https://syncthing.net/ The local
>discovery protocol looks easy enough to begin with, as it is only UDP
>Your developer guide recommends to send a mail before starting
>development to check if anyone else would be working on a similar
>topic. That sounds reasonable :)
>Anybody working on that protocol yet?
>Antoine d'Otreppe
Sent via:    Wireshark-dev mailing list <[email protected]>
Archives:    https://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev
Unsubscribe: https://www.wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev
             mailto:[email protected]?subject=unsubscribe

Attachment: smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature