On Tue, Aug 18, 2015 at 5:18 AM, Gilbert Ramirez <gram@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Hi Richard.
>
> You can use the 'dftest' executable that is built along with Wireshark to
> convert a display filter string to the byte-code used for the Display Filter
> Virtual Machine. Do that for for "wlan.dmg_params.bss == 1" and compare that
> to the output for a similar display filter for another field that is also
> FT_UINT8.
>
> I suspect they will be the same; if so, it wouldn't be an issue within the
> display filter code.
>
> Is there any possibility that add_ff_dmg_params() isn't being called or
> isn't adding dmg_params to the proto_tree in some cases?
So, that is what is happening. When the filter engine is called, isDMG
evals to 0, so add_ff_dmg_params is not called.
Now, why is that?
In dissect_ieee80211_common we have this code:
gboolean isDMG = (tree == NULL) ? FALSE :
proto_tree_traverse_post_order(proto_tree_get_root(tree),
is_80211ad, NULL);
(reformatted for readability).
Printfs establish that tree is not NULL when this statement is called,
so it would seem that the proto_tree_traverse_post_order failed during
filtering.
is_80211ad is a function that does a number of tests, anyone of which
could fail, I guess.
Checking further.
--
Regards,
Richard Sharpe
(何以解憂？唯有杜康。--曹操)
