Huge thanks to our Platinum Members Endace and LiveAction,
and our Silver Member Veeam, for supporting the Wireshark Foundation and project.

Wireshark-dev: Re: [Wireshark-dev] [Wireshark-commits] rev 51337: /trunk/epan/dissectors/ /trun

From: Jim Wright <James.R.Wright@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 13 Aug 2013 14:58:09 -0600
It also appears that it removes reporting of Bundle Status Report, Custody Signal and Aggregate Custody Signal so that they all are listed as "Administrative Record Type". They are distinct and it would be good to keep them separate.

Jim



On Aug 13, 2013, at 2:10 PM, Jeff Morriss wrote:

> On 08/13/13 07:37, mmann@xxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote:
>> http://anonsvn.wireshark.org/viewvc/viewvc.cgi?view=rev&revision=51337
>> 
>> User: mmann
>> Date: 2013/08/13 04:37 AM
>> 
>> Log:
>>  Some improvements to the bundle protocol:
>>  1. Cleanly break out Convergence Layer Protocol (TCPCL) into its own (new-style) pure dissector.
>>  2. Make Bundle dissection into a new style dissector and clean so that it can be called using call_disssector.
>>  3. Use tcp_dissect_pdus for TCPCL protocol instead of "manual" while loop.  This allows contact header to benefit from TCP fragmentation.
>>  4. Make time fields use time field types so they can be filterable.
>>  5. A few functions were move to remove need for static declaration at top of file.
>>  6. Remove pri_hdr_procflags global variable.
>> 
>>  Next up - making more fields filterable.
> 
> This change doesn't compile with warnings turned on:
> 
>> ../../../epan/dissectors/packet-dtn.c: In function 'dissect_payload_header':
>> ../../../epan/dissectors/packet-dtn.c:1260:17: error: variable 'header_start' set but not used [-Werror=unused-but-set-variable]
>> ../../../epan/dissectors/packet-dtn.c: In function 'dissect_bundle':
>> ../../../epan/dissectors/packet-dtn.c:2259:17: error: variable 'bundle_tree' set but not used [-Werror=unused-but-set-variable]
>> cc1: all warnings being treated as errors
> 
> The first one is a simple removal but I can't immediately tell whether 
> the now-unused tree should be used or not.
> 
> ___________________________________________________________________________
> Sent via:    Wireshark-dev mailing list <wireshark-dev@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Archives:    http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev
> Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev
>             mailto:wireshark-dev-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx?subject=unsubscribe