So should r45182 and r45189 be scheduled for backport to fix bug 6208?
- Chris
________________________________________
From: wireshark-commits-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [wireshark-commits-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of darkjames@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [darkjames@xxxxxxxxxxxxx]
Sent: Friday, September 28, 2012 6:08 AM
To: wireshark-commits@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [Wireshark-commits] rev 45189: /trunk/ /trunk/: cfile.h file.c
http://anonsvn.wireshark.org/viewvc/viewvc.cgi?view=rev&revision=45189
User: darkjames
Date: 2012/09/28 03:08 AM
Log:
Revert r45183:r45184
r45182 was good fix, but updae frames_count when redissecting.
Directory: /trunk/
Changes Path Action
+1 -1 cfile.h Modified
+14 -11 file.c Modified
--
CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: The information contained in this email message is intended only for use of the intended recipient. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copying of this communication is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please immediately delete it from your system and notify the sender by replying to this email. Thank you.
