Guy, Jaap, and Andres,
Unn, that's weird. I simply did "svn diff" against the up-to-date SVN
repository on MacOS X 10.6.7 with svn version 1.6.5 (r38866).
I will look into it further. Thank you all for your help.
Regards,
---
Motonori Shindo
2011/4/6 Guy Harris <guy@xxxxxxxxxxxx>:
>
> On Apr 5, 2011, at 11:04 PM, Motonori Shindo wrote:
>
>> Anders,
>>
>> Ooops, my brain seems to stay in the days of 5 years ago, when we used
>> to post patches on the dev mailing list. I will open the case in
>> bugzilla. I don't know why the patch doesn't apply. I will check it.
>
> Part of the problem appears to be that, as Jaap noticed, whatever generated the patch failed to run a format string through printf or its equivalent:
>
> Index: epan/dissectors/packet-netflow.c
> ===================================================================
> --- epan/dissectors/packet-netflow.c (revision 36487)
> +++ epan/dissectors/packet-netflow.c (working copy)
> @@ -%ld,%ld +%ld,%ld @@
>
> ...
>
> That *looks* similar to the output of "svn diff"; I don't know what tool it was, or why it appears not to have run "@@ -%ld,%ld +%ld,%ld @@" through printf with the line numbers as arguments....
> ___________________________________________________________________________
> Sent via: Wireshark-dev mailing list <wireshark-dev@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Archives: http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev
> Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev
> mailto:wireshark-dev-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx?subject=unsubscribe
>
