Wireshark · Wireshark-dev: Re: [Wireshark-dev] Microsoft vs. clang static analysis

[Guy Harris <guy@xxxxxxxxxxxx>]

On Feb 17, 2011, at 3:52 PM, Guy Harris wrote:

> We weren't tagging no-return functions as such in a way Microsoft's tools recognized

We now are tagging our own no-return functions that way, and that squelched a bunch of warnings - Microsoft's analyzer now knows that, for example, DISSECTOR_ASSERT() never returns.  (Now, a lot of those are the null-pointer errors that we're suppressing for now, but....)