On Wed, Sep 02, 2009 at 09:09:36PM +0200, Kovarththanan Rajaratnam wrote:
> > It's a trade off, the idea being that by keeping the entire list the list
> > does not have to be recreated at refiltering. With the new packet list the
> > cost of adding a packet is low.
>
> I think the point Joerg was trying to make is that the packet list view
> (not the underlying packet list store) is updated even when no packets
> are added to it. Am I correct Joerg?
Yes, it's only about the view.
Thanks
Joerg
--
Joerg Mayer <jmayer@xxxxxxxxx>
We are stuck with technology when what we really want is just stuff that
works. Some say that should read Microsoft instead of technology.
