Hmm it may be broken I didn't get the expected result with one of my
traces on the latest SVN but I don't have the time
To trouble shoot it right now...
Regards
Anders
-----Original Message-----
From: wireshark-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
[mailto:wireshark-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Jaap Keuter
Sent: den 7 maj 2008 18:20
To: Developer support list for Wireshark
Subject: Re: [Wireshark-dev] Adding a new payload type to the RTP
protocol
Hi,
Maybe the best way to do it is to have a dissector for your signaling
protocol which sets up the RTP dissector. See rtp_add_address().
Thanx,
Jaap
Antoine bousquet wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> First of all, I want to say that I discovered WireShark a few day ago
> and that I find it great. But the problem is I'm working with a RTP
> protocol but my dynamic payload type is not known by WireShark. So I
> decided that it would be great to add it so I could use WireShark in a
> better way. My problem is I was wondering if it would be better to
> create a new RTP dissector plugin with my payload type in it or to
> modify the actual RTP dissector. What would be the simpliest, knowing
> that I want to use my new dissector on a lot of computer, so
reinstalling WireShark on all of them would be painful.
>
> Thank you
> Antoine Bousquet
>
_______________________________________________
Wireshark-dev mailing list
Wireshark-dev@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://www.wireshark.org/mailman/listinfo/wireshark-dev
