Wireshark-dev: Re: [Wireshark-dev] Adding a new payload type to the RTP protocol
From: "Anders Broman" <[email protected]>
Date: Wed, 7 May 2008 18:23:06 +0200
Hmm it may be broken I didn't get the expected result with one of my
traces on the latest SVN but I don't have the time
To trouble shoot it right now...
Regards
Anders 

-----Original Message-----
From: [email protected]
[mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Jaap Keuter
Sent: den 7 maj 2008 18:20
To: Developer support list for Wireshark
Subject: Re: [Wireshark-dev] Adding a new payload type to the RTP
protocol

Hi,

Maybe the best way to do it is to have a dissector for your signaling
protocol which sets up the RTP dissector. See rtp_add_address().

Thanx,
Jaap

Antoine bousquet wrote:
> Hi all,
> 
> First of all, I want to say that I discovered WireShark a few day ago 
> and that I find it great.  But the problem is I'm working with a RTP 
> protocol but my dynamic payload type is not known by WireShark.  So I 
> decided that it would be great to add it so I could use WireShark in a

> better way.  My problem is I was wondering if it would be better to 
> create a new RTP dissector plugin with my payload type in it or to 
> modify the actual RTP dissector.  What would be the simpliest, knowing

> that I want to use my new dissector on a lot of computer, so
reinstalling WireShark on all of them would be painful.
> 
> Thank you
> Antoine Bousquet
> 

_______________________________________________
Wireshark-dev mailing list
[email protected]
http://www.wireshark.org/mailman/listinfo/wireshark-dev