Wireshark-dev: Re: [Wireshark-dev] ADNS alternative
From: "Sébastien Tandel" <[email protected]>
Date: Sat, 3 May 2008 14:13:58 -0300
Hi,

  there is also libevent which is portable, maintained and seems well-documented :-)


Regards,
Sebastien

On Fri, May 2, 2008 at 9:08 AM, Jaap Keuter <[email protected]> wrote:
Hi,

Looking at the suggestions I see this:
Poslib seems to have been developed until 2005, similar problem as ADNS. It's
a C++ lib as well, causing a binding problem.
UDNS looks interesting as well. As it's conceptual model is further from ADNS
than c-ares is it might take more work to get it interfaced. Another thing not
apparent is the cross platform support. There is mention of a Win32 port, but
that is stated to be out of date.

Thanx,
Jaap



Graham Bloice wrote:
> Gerald Combs wrote:
>> Jaap Keuter wrote:
>>
>>> Hi list,
>>>
>>> I've stumbled upon c-ares (http://daniel.haxx.se/projects/c-ares/) as a
>>> possible replacement for ADNS, which we currently have as async DNS resolver
>>> library.
>>> Pro's: Still being developed, IPv6 support, multi-platform, MIT license.
>>> Con's: May suffer from same memory allocation issues on Win32 as does ADNS.
>>>
>>> Does anyone have further insights into the use of this library?
>>>
>>
>> It looks interesting. The fact that it's documented and actively developed is
>> encouraging.
>> _______________________________________________
>>
> It also has some Freexxx() functions that seem to handle freeing
> allocations that the lib makes.
>
>  From the web site, they also have a link to other similar libs, Poslib
> (http://posadis.sourceforge.net/) and UDNS
> (http://www.corpit.ru/mjt/udns.html) look interesting.
>
> --
> Regards,
>
> Graham Bloice
>

_______________________________________________
Wireshark-dev mailing list
[email protected]
http://www.wireshark.org/mailman/listinfo/wireshark-dev