-----Ursprungligt meddelande-----
Från: wireshark-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
[mailto:wireshark-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] För Ulf Lamping
Skickat: den 24 april 2007 23:05
Till: Developer support list for Wireshark
Ämne: Re: [Wireshark-dev] [Wireshark-commits] rev 21556: /trunk/epan/
/trunk/epan/: proto.c proto.h - all buildbots red now :-(
Anders Broman wrote:
>> Hi,
>> I have no problem with backing out my changes but a
>> Proto_... function should not be local to iuup in my opinion.
>> Perhaps it should be renamed iuup_proto_.. instead until
>> We have "the real thing" in proto.c
>>
>> What do others think?
>>
>Well, first of all, we shouldn't have a buildbot going into deep red for
>a long time, so there's something to be done.
>I'll fully agree that a function starting with proto_ shouldn't be in
>any dissector code - a name clash will be the result sooner or later -
>and today is sooner ;-)
>Could you please:
>1.) fix the issue in iuup by prepending iuup_ so the buildbot get's
>green again - I'm currently waiting for it :-(
Joerg beat me to it.
>2.) if your new function doesn't follow the common function pattern, fix
>this issue in your implementation (I didn't had a look at the code in
>proto myself)
Well what pattern it should have is being discussed.
As I see it:
Alt
1) Leave it as it is and change other proto_add.. functions to behave
similarly.
1b) Leave the signature but rename it to something like
proto_tree_add_bits_ret_val() and add similar functions for other stuff.
2) use(proto_tree* tree, int hf, tvbuff_t* tvb, int offset, int bit_offset,
guint bits) as in iuup
3) use (proto_tree *tree, int hf_index, tvbuff_t *tvb, gint bit_offset, gint
no_of_bits, gboolean little_endian)
Other?
Regards
Anders
_______________________________________________
Wireshark-dev mailing list
Wireshark-dev@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://www.wireshark.org/mailman/listinfo/wireshark-dev
