Anders Broman wrote:
Hi,
I have no problem with backing out my changes but a
Proto_... function should not be local to iuup in my opinion.
Perhaps it should be renamed iuup_proto_.. instead until
We have "the real thing" in proto.c
What do others think?
Well, first of all, we shouldn't have a buildbot going into deep red for
a long time, so there's something to be done.
I'll fully agree that a function starting with proto_ shouldn't be in
any dissector code - a name clash will be the result sooner or later -
and today is sooner ;-)
Could you please:
1.) fix the issue in iuup by prepending iuup_ so the buildbot get's
green again - I'm currently waiting for it :-(
2.) if your new function doesn't follow the common function pattern, fix
this issue in your implementation (I didn't had a look at the code in
proto myself)
3.) change iuup to use the new function in proto.h (probably has to be
done by someone else than you)
Regards, ULFL
