Wireshark · Wireshark-dev: Re: [Wireshark-dev] [PATCH] range_string in proto_tree_add_item

[Sebastien Tandel <sebastien@xxxxxxxxx>]

Hi Steve,


   It was discussed in the thread with Guy
(http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev/200701/msg02454.html) ...


Regards,
Sebastien Tandel

>>    re-post of a patch described here ...
>> http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev/200701/msg00321.html
>>     
>
> Is there any way to avoid having to OR that one value when using an 
> RVAL()?  It would be a lot cleaner / easier for people to use if so.
>
>
> Steve
>
> _______________________________________________
> Wireshark-dev mailing list
> Wireshark-dev@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> http://www.wireshark.org/mailman/listinfo/wireshark-dev
>