Wireshark · Wireshark-dev: Re: [Wireshark-dev] [PATCH] range_string in proto_tree_add_item

Huge thanks to our Platinum Members Endace and LiveAction,
and our Silver Member Veeam, for supporting the Wireshark Foundation and project.

Wireshark-dev: Re: [Wireshark-dev] [PATCH] range_string in proto_tree_add_item

From: Stephen Fisher <stephentfisher@xxxxxxxxx>

Date: Mon, 5 Feb 2007 12:35:26 -0800

On Sun, Feb 04, 2007 at 06:53:59PM +0100, Sebastien Tandel wrote:

>    re-post of a patch described here ...
> http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev/200701/msg00321.html

Is there any way to avoid having to OR that one value when using an 
RVAL()?  It would be a lot cleaner / easier for people to use if so.

Steve

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [Wireshark-dev] [PATCH] range_string in proto_tree_add_item
  - From: Sebastien Tandel

References:
- [Wireshark-dev] [PATCH] range_string in proto_tree_add_item
  - From: Sebastien Tandel

Prev by Date: Re: [Wireshark-dev] Name resolution
Next by Date: Re: [Wireshark-dev] [PATCH] Fixup for a segfault with gtk1.2
Previous by thread: [Wireshark-dev] [PATCH] range_string in proto_tree_add_item
Next by thread: Re: [Wireshark-dev] [PATCH] range_string in proto_tree_add_item
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

© Wireshark Foundation · Privacy Policy

Facebook·Mastodon·Twitter·YouTube