> Anders Broman (AL/EAB) wrote:
>
> > Alejandro I think your proposed plugin looks realy good and
> something we
> > would have use for.
> > From the recent mails I'm a bit confused to where we stand
> on this. I
> > think Guy had some comments
> > on the implementation, is that beeing worked on or is further
> > discussions needed?
>
> I have a version that builds on OS X (not as a plugin)
> without doing any
> type-casting of function pointers.
>
> I couldn't test it with one capture, though, as it appears to expect
> that the RTP packets carrying the voice part of the call (as
> opposed to
> the signaling part of the call) are part of the call as
> displayed by the
> graph of the call - but that's not the case with the H.323
> call in the
> capture. Is the intent that voice packets be part of the
> call, or not?
Guy, are you awaiting an answer from Alejandro? What prevents the
inclusion (or enablement) of listen_rtp now that we have just passed a
Wireshark release?
Thanks,
Olivier.
