Comment # 15
on bug 12765
from Guy Harris
(In reply to Jeff Morriss from comment #14)
> A very good point. I'd still argue (though less vehemently :-)) that the
> change shouldn't have been backported. Humans can learn new stuff but they
> shouldn't have to when going from 2.0.4 to 2.0.5 (IMO). But maybe I'm
> projecting too much of a RHEL-like view of stability.
On the other hand, it also suggests that undoing the change in the 2.0 branch
isn't a ZOMG THAT BROKE ALL MY SCRIPTS!!!!!111ONE!!!!!! change, so maybe we
*should* do that and let the humans adapt to going back to the old way.
However, that just delays the day of reckoning unless they *never* upgrade to
2.2 or beyond.
You are receiving this mail because:
- You are watching all bug changes.
