| Bug ID |
12744
|
| Summary |
Highlighting doesn't work correctly
|
| Product |
Wireshark
|
| Version |
2.3.x (Experimental)
|
| Hardware |
x86-64
|
| OS |
Debian
|
| Status |
UNCONFIRMED
|
| Severity |
Normal
|
| Priority |
Low
|
| Component |
Dissection engine (libwireshark)
|
| Assignee |
[email protected]
|
| Reporter |
[email protected]
|
Created attachment 14808 [details]
IS-IS LSP with correct checksum
Build Information:
Wireshark 2.3.0-299-ga5166af (Git Rev Unknown from unknown)
Copyright 1998-2016 Gerald Combs <[email protected]> and contributors.
License GPLv2+: GNU GPL version 2 or later
<http://www.gnu.org/licenses/old-licenses/gpl-2.0.html>
This is free software; see the source for copying conditions. There is NO
warranty; not even for MERCHANTABILITY or FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE.
Compiled (64-bit) with GTK+ 3.20.7, with Cairo 1.14.6, with Pango 1.40.1, with
libpcap, without POSIX capabilities, without libnl, with GLib 2.48.1, with zlib
1.2.8, with SMI 0.4.8, without c-ares, without Lua, without GnuTLS, without
Gcrypt, without Kerberos, without GeoIP, with PortAudio V19-devel (built Feb 15
2014 23:28:00), without AirPcap.
Running on Linux 4.6.0-1-amd64, with locale ru_RU.UTF-8, with libpcap version
1.7.4, with zlib 1.2.8.
Intel(R) Core(TM) i7-4800MQ CPU @ 2.70GHz (with SSE4.2)
Built using gcc 6.1.1 20160802.
--
Highlighting doesn't work. While selecting particular field in the packet
details pane, whole packet is highlighted in packet bytes pane. Also, wireshark
makes incorrect conclusion about correctness of values of fields like checksum
values. There is IS-IS LSP in attachment. Wireshark says that Checksum value of
IS-IS LSP is incorrect, whereas it is correct actually.
You are receiving this mail because:
- You are watching all bug changes.
