Hi all…
I posted this to the Winpcap-users forum,
but I have not gotten a response yet. Perhaps someone here has some
experience or insight…
I used Ethereal (0.10.14)
to capture packets yesterday (Winpcap
version 3.1). When I open the resultant Ethereal file, I
notice that about every 5 or 10 packets, the timestamp is roughly 13 seconds
earlier than that of the previous packet.
Looking more closely, I see a clump of packets with
timestamps that increase normally, then a clump that are 13 seconds earlier
(but whose timestamps also increase normally), then a clump that are 13 seconds
later (lining up with the 1st clump), then a 13-seconds-earlier
clump, etc., etc., etc.
I’m probably not explaining this well L. Here
is a sample of the timestamps – this should make it clearer…
14:26:35.475498
14:26:35.475604
14:26:35.475632
14:26:49.087976
(Jumps ahead ~13.5 seconds)
14:26:49.132457
14:26:49.132573
14:26:49.132604
14:26:49.134084
14:26:35.525248
(Jumps back ~13.5 seconds)
14:26:35.525376
14:26:35.525567
14:26:49.283965
(Jumps ahead ~13.5 seconds)
14:26:49.882512
14:26:49.882613
14:26:49.882645
… this pattern continues forever and ever (or, at
least for the 35 minutes of the capture)
Has anyone seen this? Any ideas?
If I understand how Winpcap works (that’s a big
“IF”), Winpcap grabs the packet, applies a timestamp using the
system clock, passes it to Ethereal, who gives it the next frame number and
adds it to the packet set, and waits for the next packet. So, how these
timestamps are showing this behavior has got me good and puzzled J.
ADDITIONAL INFO
OS: MS
Windows 2000 SP2
Proc: x86 Family 6 Model
8 Stepping 3
NIC: Compaq
NC3163 Fast Ethernet NIC
Thx much,
Michael
Michael Feeny
TDDS Application Integration Management
609-274-2761 (Office)
484-995-1745 (Mobile)
1-888-MERRIL0 (Page)
feenyman99 (AIM)
If you are not an intended recipient of this e-mail, please notify the
sender, delete it and do not read, act upon, print, disclose, copy, retain or
redistribute it. Click here for
important additional terms relating to this e-mail. http://www.ml.com/email_terms/
