Wireshark · Ethereal-users: Re: [Ethereal-users] creating a PCAP file from unencapsulated MTP3 traces

Huge thanks to our Platinum Members Endace and LiveAction,
and our Silver Member Veeam, for supporting the Wireshark Foundation and project.

Ethereal-users: Re: [Ethereal-users] creating a PCAP file from unencapsulated MTP3 traces

Note: This archive is from the project's previous web site, ethereal.com. This list is no longer active.

From: Michael Tuexen <Michael.Tuexen@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>

Date: Fri, 6 May 2005 09:19:53 +0200

Yes, you are right, 141 is the number. A typo on my side.

Best regards
Michael

On May 6, 2005, at 12:26 AM, LEGO wrote:

If you put MTP3 packets in the file you need to
use the -l 142 option.


It is actually 141 instead of 142

I hope this helps.


Yes it did!

Thanks

References:
- [Ethereal-users] creating a PCAP file from unencapsulated MTP3 traces
  - From: LEGO
- Re: [Ethereal-users] creating a PCAP file from unencapsulated MTP3 traces
  - From: Michael Tuexen
- Re: [Ethereal-users] creating a PCAP file from unencapsulated MTP3 traces
  - From: LEGO

Prev by Date: Re: [Ethereal-users] decoding GSM MAP
Next by Date: Re: [Ethereal-users] 802.1Q packets with Broadcom gigabit on Latitude D610 in Windows XP
Previous by thread: Re: [Ethereal-users] creating a PCAP file from unencapsulated MTP3 traces
Next by thread: [Ethereal-users] Capture Filter on port - strange behavior
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

© Wireshark Foundation · Privacy Policy

Facebook·Mastodon·Twitter·YouTube