Wireshark · Ethereal-users: Re: [Ethereal-users] SEQ Number

[ronnie sahlberg <ronniesahlberg@xxxxxxxxx>]

this change went in Jan 20.


On 5/3/05, Hansang Bae <hbae@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> 
> >On 5/2/05, Hansang Bae <hbae@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >> But as of now, the relative seq numbering doesn't work within TCP analysis section (for things like SACK etc.)
> 
> On 11:33 PM 5/1/2005, ronnie sahlberg wrote:
> >yes it does.
> 
> I know the last time I used relative seq numbers (which I like), it did not make it into the SACK value.  So it was tedious to find out what the SACK was referring to since it used real seq numbers.  I'll have to fire it up with 0.10.10 and try again.
> 
> thanks!
> 
> hsb
> 
>