Huge thanks to our Platinum Members Endace and LiveAction,
and our Silver Member Veeam, for supporting the Wireshark Foundation and project.
Wireshark logo

Ethereal-dev: Re: [Ethereal-dev] Capture ringbuffer behaviour, 2nd proposal

Note: This archive is from the project's previous web site, ethereal.com. This list is no longer active.

Date Prev · Date Next · Thread Prev · Thread Next
Date Index · Thread Index · Other Months · All Mailing Lists
From: "Lars Ruoff" <lars.ruoff@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 1 Mar 2004 16:33:44 +0100
From: "Jason House"
> Both approaches (I believe) would separate "Capture Files" from "Capture
> Limits"... I think Biot's comments was just the "Capture Files" section.

The point is that if you use a maximum file number but do *not* use the ring
buffer, then it effectively limits your overall capture - so my logic was
that it should go into capture limits!

Lars
Wireshark logo footer

© Wireshark Foundation · Privacy Policy

Facebook·Mastodon·Twitter·YouTube