You also posted about this during the week... I suspect a lot of us
are frequently swamped during the week and don't have time to give your
work the kind of examination it deserves before commenting on it.
Ed
On Thu, 8 Mar 2001, Hartmut Mueller wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I am a little bit confused. I expected humiliating discussions about coding
> style rather than none of the devellopers in this list commenting on
> hethereal at all.
>
> Personally I believe hethereal is great
> - where you can or must place a dedicated computer for capturing
> - where you work with several OSs on your desktop
> - for dial-in access, e.g. facility management / remote administration
>
> Please tell us what you think of hethereal. We know that it needs to be
> improved, but we would like to have it included in the CVS if there are no
> objections.
>
> Yours, Hartmut
>
> On Tuesday, 6. March 2001 22:46, Carsten Buchenau wrote:
> >
> > Hethereal provides an HTML interface to Ethereal. It uses a lot of
> > Javascript and was successfully testet against Netscape-4.76 (Linux) and
> > IE-5.5. Unfortunately Konqueror doesn't work and Mozilla (Linux) has big
> > trouble with frames. We also use the cgihtml library, a C-API to
> > CGI-environment. See below.
> >
> > You can see Hethereal in action on
> > http://www.abmlinux.org/cgi-bin/hethereal.cgi.
> >
> > This is part of our (3 students) diploma work and is intented to build a
> > protocol-analysator based on an Embedded-PC running Linux, so the only
> > interface shall be the Apache (mod_ssl) WebServer.
> [...]
>
> _______________________________________________
> Ethereal-dev mailing list
> Ethereal-dev@xxxxxxxxxxxx
> http://www.ethereal.com/mailman/listinfo/ethereal-dev
>
