On Jan 13, 2018, at 12:45 AM, Ralph Schmieder <ralph.schmieder@xxxxxxx> wrote:
> But no, it's the same result. In fact, I used that option in curl (and also tried with stdbuf -o0). Would have been surprised if the results were different since the "-i -" does deliver the packets in / close-to real-time which seems to proof that the issue is not buffering in curl but in tshark.
Yes, it's buffering in tshark, but it's *input* buffering, not *output* buffering, so it has the same behavior as if curl were buffering *its* output in 4096-byte chunks.
