Glenn Andrews wrote:
> 2 years and no one has fixed it ?
> Is there a set of MIBs out there that would pass without error ?
I have asked Juergen about this before. The parser needs some
modification to handle the APPLICATION type clause in the definition so
it will accept the "large" integers.
If you change all the occurences of numbers bigger than 2^31-1 to 2^31-1
it will get rid of the "error".
There's no point in being grown up if you can't be childish sometimes.
-- Dr. Who