Huge thanks to our Platinum Members Endace and LiveAction,
and our Silver Member Veeam, for supporting the Wireshark Foundation and project.

Wireshark-users: Re: [Wireshark-users] filter for ONLY initial get request

From: Jeffs <jeffs@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 11 Aug 2010 16:08:20 -0400
On 8/11/2010 9:35 AM, Thierry Emmanuel wrote:

-----Original Message-----
From: wireshark-users-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:wireshark-users-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Jeffs
Sent: mercredi 11 ao�t 2010 15:07
To: Community support list for Wireshark
Subject: Re: [Wireshark-users] filter for ONLY initial get request

This formula, however, only returns results minus the links and images
embedded in the web page:

tshark -r test.cap -T fields -e http.host  | sed 's/?.*$//' | sed -n
'/www./p'  | sort | uniq -c | sort -rn | head -n 100

15 www.propertyshark.com
       8 www.nytimes.com
       2 www.google-analytics.com
       1 www.facebook.com


However, I am new to regex so I'm sure I may be missing  something or
losing some links.


It is a common mistake to consider that every websites have their main
address on a "www" subdomain. If you want a generic filter, you cannot
rely on it. If you want a relevant result, you'll have to build a
non-restrictive regexp and manually filter unappropriate results,
eventually making some rules to exclude well-known advertising sites.

A fully automatic solution would be to parse the data checking it is
a well-formed html (or xml or plain-text) document. This will purge
videos and images from your results.



I agree that not all websites have their main address as "www". But given that I am up until now unable to effectively remove all the extra domains that are captured and I am therefore bringing in a lot of extraneous domain names, I have to choose between the lesser of two evils -- lose some domains or pull in a lot of unwanted domain names that totally pollute my desired results.

I wish there was a way to capture ONLY the initially requested URL that is either clicked or typed into the browser address bar.

I was thinking that maybe a tap might solve this problem because it would capture only one half of a duplex conversation on one wire (the outgoing request) and thus only capture the requested URL.

Your suggestion of parsing the data is indeed unique and intersting. Are you suggesting that dumpcap or ethereal would somehow interogate the link, follow it and then make a determination. This sounds like a very interesting prospect but I'm not fully sure I understand how it would work.

Thank you.