On Jun 15, 2010, at 11:15 AM, Gus Ishere wrote:
> Is there a way for a single UDP packet to produce several entries in the packet list?
No.
> I think that I would have a dissector for the entire UDP packet, which would then identify the subpackets and pass these through a subpacket dissector. I think this is what would make most sense in analyzing this protocol,
Yes, that's what is done in this and other circumstances.
That won't cause multiple packets to show up in the packet list; however, it will show separate entities in the packet detail.
