Wireshark-users: Re: [Wireshark-users] Reliability?
Thanks. Those are the steps I
took yesterday and it seems to be much better now. As it happens, that is
exactly the scenario we are looking for, a VOIP problem that happens every
10-20,000 hours. Kinda tough to catch. Cheers, Bob Eugene, OR - Tucson, AZ From:
wireshark-users-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
[mailto:wireshark-users-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Steve Smith What
have you got in display options ?� I have this problem frequently trying
to capture intermittent voip issues that might not occur for days. I
had much more success unticking update list in real time, and ticking hide
capture dialog.� The only way to see it is capturing is the status bar counter,
watching the packet counter go up.� That would then run for days. Updating
list in real time brought it to its knees pretty quick. I
usually go for 50mb files because they're easy to work with and can be joined
together easy enough if reqd. From: wireshark-users-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
[mailto:wireshark-users-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxx]
On Behalf Of Bob Carlson � We have been trying to do a long running capture and we
cannot keep Wireshark up and running. WS is up to date. We are monitoring 1
port and writing out 100MB files. Each file is filled in a 2-4 hours. WS will
not stay up forever. It dies every so often. We are trying a larger buffer
size. � Are there any known issues? � Cheers, Bob � Bob Carlson | +1 719 571 9228 (office)�
| +1 541 521 9525 (mobile) bob@xxxxxxxxxxxxx� | rjcarlson49 (aim or skype) __________ Information from ESET Smart Security, version of virus signature
database 4878 (20100218) __________ The message was checked by ESET Smart Security. http://www.eset.com __________ Information from ESET Smart Security, version of virus signature
database 4881 (20100219) __________ The message was checked by ESET Smart Security. http://www.eset.com __________ Information from ESET Smart Security, version of virus signature database 4881 (20100219) __________ The message was checked by ESET Smart Security. http://www.eset.com |
- References:
- Re: [Wireshark-users] Reliability?
- From: Steve Smith
- Re: [Wireshark-users] Reliability?
- Prev by Date: Re: [Wireshark-users] Reliability?
- Next by Date: Re: [Wireshark-users] collision in the network card
- Previous by thread: Re: [Wireshark-users] Reliability?
- Next by thread: [Wireshark-users] nfs attrs
- Index(es):
- Get Wireshark
- Download
- Code of Conduct