Yes, the frame number column is what I was referring to. A field corresponding to the un-disassembled (I think) frames would help.
Thanks Guy,
Wes
--- On Sat, 1/30/10, Guy Harris <guy@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> From: Guy Harris <guy@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Subject: Re: [Wireshark-users] Frame Numbers on Concatenated Frames
> To: "Community support list for Wireshark" <wireshark-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Date: Saturday, January 30, 2010, 2:32 PM
>
> On Jan 30, 2010, at 10:52 AM, Wes wrote:
>
> > Is there a way to set Wireshark to not count the
> broken out frames from a Docsis concatenated frame? Just to
> try to be more clear, I see a Concatenated Frame #1 which
> contains two concatenated packets. Then Wireshark shows
> those 2 packets with frame numbers #2 and #3. Hope this
> makes sense.
>
> If by "frame number" you mean the frame number column, that
> is intended to be the ordinal number of the lowest-level
> frames in the capture file. We could probably add to
> the DOCSIS dissector a field corresponding to reassembled
> frame numbers, and you could use that as a custom column.
> ___________________________________________________________________________
> Sent via: Wireshark-users mailing list <wireshark-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Archives: http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-users
> Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-users
>
> mailto:wireshark-users-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx?subject=unsubscribe
>
