Michael Glenn wrote:
> "But, question is can I get the capture without doing port mirroring?"
>
> Nope; connections on a switch are strictly point-to-point for anything
> except broadcast packets: Any traffic between 1 & 2 won't even show up
> on the line to 3.
>
> Only thing I can suggest is that you find a dumb hub (*not* a switch!)
> and connect it somewhere along the line between 1 & 2, then connect
> machine #3 to the hub.
>
>
> >>> sean bzd <
seanbzd@xxxxxxxxx> 01/28/2010 15:21 >>>
> Folks,
> Need some advice/help here.
>
> *_We have a scenario:_*
>
> 3 Windows machines all connected to the same Cisco Switch.
> Machine1 and Machine2 are exchanging some data that need to be captured.
> Ideally, I could install wireshark on either Machine1 or Machine2 and
> capture all the traffic being exchanged between the two. But since these
> are production machines, we don't want to change/install anything on
> these 2 machines. Is there a way I can install wireshark on Machine3 and
> capture the traffic between Machine1 and Machine2? I know I can do port
> mirroring on the Cisco switch and capture it from Machine3. But,
> question is can I get the capture without doing port mirroring? I see
> that the capture Options dialog box in wireshark has an option for Local
> Vs. Remote interface? What is it used for? Has anyone used this before?
>
> Thanks for your help.
> Sean.
>
