On Jan 15, 2010, at 3:04 PM, Gianluca Varenni wrote:
> It's not documented, and depends on the version of Windows, the service
> pack, and the HAL type... Most of the times it's a non-compensated RDTSC,
> however.
If it's just RDTSC, wouldn't it have the same problems on "SpeedStep machines" as raw RDTSC? The description in the mail was
> Possible values are
> a.. 0 (default) -> Timestamps generated through KeQueryPerformanceCounter, less reliable on SMP/HyperThreading machines, precision = some microseconds
> b.. 2 -> Timestamps generated through KeQuerySystemTime, more reliable on SMP/HyperThreading machines, precision = scheduling quantum (10/15 ms)
> c.. 3 -> Timestamps generated through the i386 instruction RDTSC, less reliable on SMP/HyperThreading/SpeedStep machines, precision = some microseconds
Also, should it say "machines where the clock rate is variable" or something such as that? I don't know whether Intel still calls it "SpeedStep", and AMD have their own names for it.
