Wireshark-users: Re: [Wireshark-users] why SACK field duplicates TSN/number of duplicates is not
On Aug 24, 2009, at 1:02 AM, Ariel Burbaickij wrote:

Was there any particular reason behind the implementation decision (at
least in versions of wireshark I have seen) not to take
duplicate TSN/number of duplicates from SACK packet into consideration
or did it just more or less occasionally happened?
There was not particular reason. It was implemented what we needed

I you think the duplicate TSN stuff is important to you, could you file
an enhancement request?

Best regards

Ariel Burbaickij
Sent via: Wireshark-users mailing list <[email protected] >
Archives:    http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-users
Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-users
            mailto:[email protected]?subject=unsubscribe