On Feb 6, 2009, at 3:20 PM, Abhik Sarkar wrote:
Hi Dinesh,
This is currently not possible, but I have submitted a patch
(https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3242) which might
make it possible.
Well, semi-possible, anyway. See the bug for details on why it
doesn't work - and, if it adds additional header types when it sees
them in the file, why it *can't* work - with TShark, and why it would
be limited (for the same reason) in its use in Wireshark, and also see
it for an alternative suggestion (which requires that the user
explicitly tell Wireshark/TShark about those fields before it starts
up).
