Sake Blok wrote:
I think it *is* a cisco bug...
I tried to open the bug-tracker, but it seems to be offline at
the moment. I think you should open a case with the Cisco-TAC
for this issue. Feel free to use my analysis in the report.
(if my assumptions on addresses were correct of course)
Frank Bulk wrote (in a previous EMail)
> I used bittwiste to remove the first 12 bytes of the attached packet
> capture that included a variety of traffic, and you'll see that some
> packets are fine, but others, such as 4, 7, 8, etc are not.
> Can anyone make sense of it?
On additional note: Looking at the packets in the longer capture it
appears to me that some are messed up in different ways from the first.
In addition there are a few packets which seem to have had all the PPOE
stuff stripped so that they look like good packets in the original capture.
