On Fri, Feb 22, 2008 at 01:49:29AM -0800, Guy Harris wrote:
> Sake Blok wrote:
> > On Thu, Feb 21, 2008 at 10:01:48PM -0700, Stephen Fisher wrote:
>
> ...
>
> >> This is not currently possible because there is no field that contains
> >> the contents of the entire frame.
>
> Actually, there is - "frame".
> And
> frame contains "blablabla"
> or
> frame contains 00:40:3f
Thanks for the correction. I tried it last night and I thought it
wasn't working when I typed frame contains, but this morning it does
indeed work. :O
Steve
