Huge thanks to our Platinum Members Endace and LiveAction,
and our Silver Member Veeam, for supporting the Wireshark Foundation and project.

Wireshark-users: Re: [Wireshark-users] ANSI MAP: returnResultLast not decoded

From: "Giraud, Armand" <armand.giraud@xxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 14 Jan 2008 10:16:38 +0000

Hi Anders,

 

It works perfectly, thanks!

 

Best Regards

Armand Giraud 
Opencall Solution Architect 

HP Software
+33 4 76 14 14 16 office | +33 6 72 99 11 60 mobile | armand.giraud@xxxxxx
B3N2F2 CC G18 | 5, av Raymond Chanas |  38053 Grenoble | France
www.hp.com/go/software


From: wireshark-users-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:wireshark-users-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Anders Broman
Sent: Monday, January 14, 2008 10:51 AM
To: Community support list for Wireshark
Subject: Re: [Wireshark-users] ANSI MAP: returnResultLast not decoded

 

Hi,

A Bug has been recently solved in the code matching Args and Results could you try a development build from http://www.wireshark.org/download/automated/

Regards

Anders

 


From: wireshark-users-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:wireshark-users-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Giraud, Armand
Sent: den 14 januari 2008 10:36
To: wireshark-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [Wireshark-users] ANSI MAP: returnResultLast not decoded

With the right trace file

 

Armand Giraud 
Opencall Solution Architect 

 

From: Giraud, Armand
Sent: Monday, January 14, 2008 10:25 AM
To: 'wireshark-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxx'
Subject: ANSI MAP: returnResultLast not decoded

 

Hi Folks

 

I’m looking at an ANSI MAP trace and it is well decoded generally but the content of the various returnResultLast are not decoded.

 

My version  of wireshark is the 99.7 release.

 

In the preference I have

ANSI MAP SSNs: 8,252  (matching SSNs used in the trace)

And

TCAP: SCCP SSNs: 6,8,147,252

 

And in SCCP, there is nothing in the Users Table

 

I have the following message

  • “Dissector for ANSI TCAP NATIONAL code:0 not implemented. Contact Wireshark developers if you want this supported”

 

 

Do you think that this point could be corrected / enhanced?

 

Best regards

Armand Giraud 
Opencall Solution Architect