> > Anyway, could be a useful Wireshark feature - if you agree let me
know
> > and I'll put it on the wish list.
>
> What would be nice would be a language to describe a packet format and
> an interpreter for the language, so that a non-programmer could add a
> dissector for simpler protocols. Even if you just know that there's a
> 34-byte header, and don't know its contents, you could describe the
> header as a 34-byte opaque blob.
Guy, that sounds like an excellent idea. Would you like me to file the
request?
--Jim
