> On 16. Aug 2021, at 18:57, Evan Huus <eapache@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> I've been poking at the bug in
> https://gitlab.com/wireshark/wireshark/-/issues/15584 but I've hit the
> limit of what I can glean from the SCTP RFC on reassembly. If anybody
> is familiar with the protocol and could provide some guidance as to
> the correct behaviour when given nested begin/end data fragments, that
> would be helpful.
It is a illegal sender behaviour. I can take a look at it (not right now),
but I assigned the bug to me...
Best regards
Michael
>
> Thanks,
> Evan
> ___________________________________________________________________________
> Sent via: Wireshark-dev mailing list <wireshark-dev@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Archives: https://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev
> Unsubscribe: https://www.wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev
> mailto:wireshark-dev-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx?subject=unsubscribe
