Huge thanks to our Platinum Members Endace and LiveAction,
and our Silver Member Veeam, for supporting the Wireshark Foundation and project.

Wireshark-dev: Re: [Wireshark-dev] Updating Migration from Gerrit Issue

From: Jano Svitok <jan.svitok@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 9 Sep 2020 07:21:48 +0200
Even better is: --force-with-lease -- similar to force but will not allow pushing when the remote branch changed since last fetch.
That way you won't lose someone else's commits accidentally.

Jano

On Wed, Sep 9, 2020 at 12:01 AM Gerald Combs <gerald@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
If you're pushing an update to a branch (i.e. a different commit onto the the same branch name) you'll need to force-push. You can do that via "push -f" or by prepending a "+" to the branch name:

$ git push -f downstream HEAD
# ...or...
$ git push downstream +HEAD

On 9/8/20 10:18 AM, Jamie Hare wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I am having some git issues when trying to update my change that I migrated from Gerrit. It failed the pipeline so I made some changes but I keep getting errors from git. I've been trying to figure it out for a few days and I am not sure what the issue is.
>
> I get 
> To gitlab.com:jamienhare/wireshark.git
>  ! [rejected]              HEAD -> ippusb-protocol (non-fast-forward)
> error: failed to push some refs to 'git@xxxxxxxxxx:jamienhare/wireshark.git'
> hint: Updates were rejected because the tip of your current branch is behind
> hint: its remote counterpart. Integrate the remote changes (e.g.
> hint: 'git pull ...') before pushing again.
> hint: See the 'Note about fast-forwards' in 'git push --help' for details.
>
> but when I try to pull it says that it is up to date. I tried to pull upstream into my master and then rebase on top of that so I have the newest changes, and it will say I am 1 commit ahead of upstream and no commits behind but whenever I try to push it still has this issue. I even tried resetting all of my changes and starting from where I was 5 days ago and I was able to push it correctly to see if it was my new changes, but that also doesn't work. 
>
> Best,
> Jamie
>
> ___________________________________________________________________________
> Sent via:    Wireshark-dev mailing list <wireshark-dev@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Archives:    https://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev
> Unsubscribe: https://www.wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev
>              mailto:wireshark-dev-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx?subject=unsubscribe
>

___________________________________________________________________________
Sent via:    Wireshark-dev mailing list <wireshark-dev@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Archives:    https://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev
Unsubscribe: https://www.wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev
             mailto:wireshark-dev-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx?subject=unsubscribe