Hello Peter,
> A request was filed earlier to add a new "tcp.ack_rel" field to ensure
> that color filters can be created that always work on the relative
> sequence numbers independent of the "Relative sequence numbers" option.
> Instead of adding a new field, I propose to change the existing ones.
> My proposed change:
> - Change the TCP sequence number-related fields to display the relative
> numbers when available. Fallback to raw numbers if they are simply
> not available (for example, when the "Analyze TCP sequence numbers"
> preference is disabled).
To avoid cluttering the TCP tree with redundant fields: can we only show the
absolutes if the relatives are also displayed? I don't think it's useful to
show the absolutes twice.
> - Modify the "Relative sequence numbers" preference to affect the
> displayed value in the Info column only.
Good.
> - The raw fields will always be available through the existing
> tcp.ack_abs and tcp.seq_abs fields. Previously they were only visible
> when "Relative sequence numbers" was disabled. This field was added
> in Wireshark 3.2.
I guess you mean "were only visible when "Relative sequence numbers" was **enabled**?
At least that's what my Wireshark does, unless I'm not thinking straight right
now (at 1:30am, it's quite possible...) :-)
> - Document these changes clearly in the release notes and corresponding
> user guides if needed.
>
> Are there any objections to this change?
No, sounds like a good solution (the "document clearly" is indeed critical here,
I guess). And I hadn't even noticed the new way of displaying
the relative sequence numbers in 3.2 yet :-)
Cheers,
Jasper
