Assuming you are serious, talking like a normal person would go a
long way towards getting your point across.
FYI, the documentation source code is here:
https://code.wireshark.org/review/gitweb?p=wireshark.git;a=tree;f=docbook;h=e4ea2271d3ec1416a0a8472148fac98b69f098c1;hb=HEAD
It is a community effort. I doubt the monospace vs bold monospace
typographical convention debacle has anyone worried sick.
On 25/01/20 10:33, Wayne Baby wrote:
To who(m) it may concern,
Please clarify the difference between your monospace and
bold monospace typographical conventions as displayed by your
examples (or completely change this convention).
There shouldn't be a need for me to elaborate on this
observation. However, I will.
There is no clear distinction between
monospace and bold monospace typographical conventions as
displayed by your examples.
Do I have to point out how important this distinction needs
to be? I will.
It is the foundation for all the conventions of your whole
document.
I'm sorry if I sound like a smart arse but it just seemed
like such a simple requirement that contradicted the
incredible intelligence underpinning all your efforts to
educate/instruct users of Wireshark.
Please make the distinction obvious,
Wayne
___________________________________________________________________________
Sent via: Wireshark-dev mailing list <wireshark-dev@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Archives: https://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev
Unsubscribe: https://www.wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev
mailto:wireshark-dev-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx?subject=unsubscribe
