On Friday, May 18, 2018, Guy Harris <
guy@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On May 18, 2018, at 6:08 PM, Ben Higgins <ben@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Sounds like it'd still be fine for there to be multiple keylog blocks,
Yes.
> but, as you say, they must occur before any packets that require the secrets contained therein. Is that correct?
Yes.
Great, thanks. I plan to have us implement this feature accordingly. Should we file a new ticket along these lines or will the existing ticket suffice?
___________________________________________________________________________
Sent via: Wireshark-dev mailing list <wireshark-dev@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Archives: https://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev
Unsubscribe: https://www.wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev
mailto:wireshark-dev-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx?subject=unsubscribe
