Wireshark · Wireshark-dev: Re: [Wireshark-dev] 2.6 branch planning and post-branch changes

Wireshark-dev: Re: [Wireshark-dev] 2.6 branch planning and post-branch changes

From: Dario Lombardo <dario.lombardo.ml@xxxxxxxxx>

Date: Thu, 15 Mar 2018 18:26:39 +0100

On Thu, Mar 15, 2018 at 5:40 PM, Jaap Keuter <jaap.keuter@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

As long as we have other means to make the (important) targets, and square the packaging (Deb’s, RPM’s, etc) out, that’s fine by me.
If we do remove this, then it should go before GTK removal, otherwise autotools builds would need fixing, and then being dropped.

I agree. That should be the first step.

References:
- [Wireshark-dev] 2.6 branch planning and post-branch changes
  - From: Gerald Combs
- Re: [Wireshark-dev] 2.6 branch planning and post-branch changes
  - From: Jaap Keuter

Prev by Date: Re: [Wireshark-dev] 2.6 branch planning and post-branch changes
Next by Date: Re: [Wireshark-dev] register_tap_listener memleak
Previous by thread: Re: [Wireshark-dev] 2.6 branch planning and post-branch changes
Next by thread: [Wireshark-dev] Windows installer path changed
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread