What would you need to be worked on? The whole set or are you looking for a new maintainer?
Regards
Roland
> Am 12.01.2018 um 23:45 schrieb Mark Murawski <markm-lists@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>:
>
> Hi,
>
> Anyone interested in this if I posted a bounty?
>
>
>> On 01/09/2018 03:12 PM, Mark Murawski wrote:
>> Trying to post this for the third time. I adjusted the url that was maybe causing my post to get (silently) dropped.
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> Is there anyone who knows of an updated sharktooks that works with the latest wireshark (2.2+) ?
>> h t t p s github dot com /armenb/sharktools
>>
>> I've contacted the author and haven't heard anything back yet. Is there someone who may be willing to help update sharktools to work with modern wireshark?
>>
>> I've done a tiny little bit of porting work so far on it, but I still have a ways to go and I'm not familiar with the history/refactors that wireshark has gone through to really do a proper port. I'm getting a bit lost in the details.
>>
>> Thanks
>>
>> ___________________________________________________________________________
>> Sent via: Wireshark-dev mailing list <wireshark-dev@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>> Archives: https://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev
>> Unsubscribe: https://www.wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev
>> mailto:wireshark-dev-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx?subject=unsubscribe
>
> ___________________________________________________________________________
> Sent via: Wireshark-dev mailing list <wireshark-dev@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Archives: https://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev
> Unsubscribe: https://www.wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev
> mailto:wireshark-dev-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx?subject=unsubscribe
