I'm not aware of any constraints with respect to URL's.
Here's a test of your message with the original URL you intended to write; let's see if this goes through ...
Is there anyone who knows of an updated sharktooks that works with the latest wireshark (2.2+) ?
I've contacted the author and haven't heard anything back yet. Is there someone who may be willing to help update sharktools to work with modern wireshark?
I've done a tiny little bit of porting work so far on it, but I still have a ways to go and I'm not familiar with the history/refactors that wireshark has gone through to really do a proper port. I'm getting a bit lost in the details.
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Wireshark-dev [mailto:[email protected]] On
> Behalf Of Mark Murawski
> Sent: Tuesday, January 9, 2018 3:14 PM
> To: [email protected]
> Subject: Re: [Wireshark-dev] Test
> What are the constraints for posting on this list? It does look like url links
> contained in a post body will cause the post to be completely blocked with no
> On 1/9/18 3:10 PM, Mark Murawski wrote:
> > I tried replying to this message with my other (real) message and it's
> > not going through. It must be tripping some anti-spam filters or
> > something like that.
> > On 1/8/18 5:39 PM, Kennedy, Smith (Wireless & Standards Architec) wrote:
> >> Ack.
> >>> On Jan 8, 2018, at 3:06 PM, Mark Murawski
> >>> <markm[email protected]> wrote:
> >>> I don't believe my last message went through.
> >>> Testing
> >>> 1
> >>> 2
> >>> 3
CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: This message is the property of International Game Technology PLC and/or its subsidiaries and may contain proprietary, confidential or trade secret information. This message is intended solely for the use of the addressee. If you are not the intended recipient and have received this message in error, please delete this message from your system. Any unauthorized reading, distribution, copying, or other use of this message or its attachments is strictly prohibited.