On Thu, Mar 30, 2017 at 09:40:13AM -0700, Chema Gonzalez wrote:
[..]
> > Alternatively, you could use a Lua post-dissector to parse out the
> > buffer that backs the field ("seq.range" below):
> >
> > tshark -Xlua_script:seq.lua -Tfields -e tcp.seq -e tcp.seq_abs ...
> >
> > -- seq.lua
> > local myproto = Proto("dummy", "dummy description")
> > myproto.fields.seq = ProtoField.uint32("tcp.seq_abs", "Abs seq no")
> > local tcp_seq = Field.new("tcp.seq")
> > function myproto.dissector(tvb, pinfo, tree)
> > local seq = tcp_seq()
> > if seq then
> > tree:add(myproto.fields.seq, seq.range)
> > end
> > end
> > register_postdissector(myproto)
> Hmm.. When I saw this, I was worried about performance. I tried, and
> it only adds an extra 20% time. It solves my problem faster than
> writing a patch to add tcp.seqraw.
>
> Thanks a lot!
Great, that is a good trace off I suppose :-)
Though 20% is still a lot. Is somebody interested to do some profiling?
Chema, what is your environment (OS, OS version) and the approximate
description of your data (pcap with x frames and y% TCP).
--
Kind regards,
Peter Wu
https://lekensteyn.nl
