On 21.10.2016 22:49, Michael Mann wrote:
>
> Depending on what you're doing, you could go with
> proto_tree_add_xxx_format_value. I think that's how most dissectors
> end up avoiding the need for BASE_CUSTOM callback.
Maybe one of you has another solution for what I want to realize.
In my protocol I've got an ID list with now ~1500 fixed values, where I
am using a value_string_ext list.
But there are dynamic list entries, for example all IDs between
0x92000000 and 0x92ffffff should be shown as DB.%d.%d using some masks.
--
Thomas
