Hi,
It's solved, but does that 'exception bit' get dissected?
Thanks,
Jaap
On 30-07-16 16:20, Dennis Luehring wrote:
> Done: https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12693
>
> Am 30.07.2016 um 08:40 schrieb Roland Knall:
>> Hi
>>
>> Please report this in a bug-report on https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/
>> and attach a sample trace detailing the issue.
>>
>> regards
>> Roland
>>
>> On Sat, Jul 30, 2016 at 8:27 AM, Dennis Luehring <dl.soluz@xxxxxxx> wrote:
>>
>> > i use a "Live on the Bleeding Edge" Version
>> >
>> >
>> https://www.wireshark.org/download/automated/win64/Wireshark-win64-2.3.0-128-g98e8b26.exe
>>
>> >
>> > Sample Modbus-Exception-Code Response:
>> > 00 00 00 00 00 03 00 88 01
>> >
>> > Modbus/TCP
>> > Transaction Identifier: 0
>> > Protocol Identifier: 0
>> > Length: 3
>> > Unit Identifier: 0
>> > Function 8: Diagnostics. Exception: Illegal function
>> > Function Code: Unknown (136) <-- !! the execption bit does not get
>> > masked here !! (136 & 0x7F) == 8
>> > Exception Code: Illegal function (1)
>> >
