Huge thanks to our Platinum Members Endace and LiveAction,
and our Silver Member Veeam, for supporting the Wireshark Foundation and project.

Wireshark-dev: Re: [Wireshark-dev] proto_tree_add_item_ret_uint() returns unmasked value - shou

From: Michael Mann <mmann78@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 18 Jul 2016 09:04:43 -0400
I've been wondering that myself, and I'm leaning towards "yes it should" because there have been many cases where I couldn't use proto_tree_add_item_ret_uint where I wanted to because masks were involved.
 
 
-----Original Message-----
From: Anders Broman <anders.broman@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
To: wireshark-dev <wireshark-dev@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Mon, Jul 18, 2016 8:45 am
Subject: [Wireshark-dev] proto_tree_add_item_ret_uint() returns unmasked value - should it?

Hi,
proto_tree_add_item_ret_uint() returns the value corresponding to the length of the value fetched e.g uint8, uint16 etc but does not take the mask of
the hf entry into consideration which lead to a bug in an proprietary dissector I have.
Should it in fact return the value displayed in the corresponding hf variable e.g take the mask into consideration?
Regards
Anders   
___________________________________________________________________________
Sent via: Wireshark-dev mailing list <wireshark-dev@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Archives: https://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev
Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev
mailto:wireshark-dev-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx?subject=unsubscribe